Is It Vanity?

β€” Mark Paxson

I’m reading a book recently published by F.L. Rose, one of my favorite indie writers. The book is called The Point of Us. I’m waiting to complete it before I reach any conclusions about the quality of the story, but I’m pretty certain it’s gonna be a good one. I’m gonna skip the description of what the story is and go right to my question for this post.

One of the main characters in the story is a writer, a pretty successful novelist. At some point, there is a discussion of writers and why they do what they do and the conclusion is … that it is all about vanity.

So … that’s my question. Do we do this for vanity? Do we slave over our stories and put them out into the world for vanity’s sake?

I’m of mixed minds on this. On the one hand, I write strictly for my own internal reasons. I don’t believe it has anything to do with vanity. I write because I want to see if I can do it. Turn an idea that forms in my head into a story with a beginning, middle and end, and is … readable. I don’t know. I write because I want to and I want to see that idea through to the final words.

But then … when I post it on my blog or publish something via the Amazon monolith, why am I doing that? The story hasn’t been blessed by the gatekeepers. No agent picked it up. No publisher. I am swimming free and clear of the gatekeepers and still putting my words out there into the wide, wide world … and why am I doing that?

Why do you do it?

In our last video chat we began a conversation about why we read. Maybe a better question for us indie authors is why do we publish?

Years ago, before technology turned the publishing world upside down, there were vanity publishers. Places a writer could go to pay thousands of dollars to have their book “published,” which typically meant getting boxes and boxes of copies of their books that the authors than had to try to figure out how to sell themselves.

Now, vanity publishers have been replaced with KDP and Ingram Spark and SmashWords and countless other platforms that allow us to publish our books with almost no cost up front. (And there are still companies like the old-fashioned vanity publishers — places that promise to publish your book for a small fee of several thousands of dollars and then leave you hanging with no support, no marketing, no nothing.)

The question remains though, regardless of how easy it has become to publish, why do we do it?

For me, I want to reach readers and hope to grow my audience and get more people reading my stories. But why? What does that mean to me if they do? Why should it matter? Particularly in the modern world of indie publishing, where there are so many books getting published it’s virtually impossible to be seen and to be read by anybody other than those who already know you.

I think there’s some truth to F.L. Rose’s thoughts as expressed in The Point of Us. There is some vanity involved. The first definition of “vanity” is “excessive pride in or admiration of one’s own appearance or achievements.”

When I read that definition, I begin to reconsider the idea that I publish for vanity. I’m far from “excessive pride in or admiration” of my writing. But I typically do like the end result. My biggest reason for publishing and sharing my stories is to … just put them out there and see if readers like what I’ve come up with. But still, there is a feeling of confirmation when I get a positive review, there is still a good feeling in the cockles of my heart when somebody has something good to say about something I’ve written. If I were to publish and none of those good things were ever said or shared with me … if I just published into a void without reaction or response … I most likely would stop publishing. And if I stopped publishing, I’d stop writing. Because at the end of the day, I write to share and to get a reaction.

Is that vanity?

Is that why we write and why we publish?

8 Comments

  1. I think the key word in the definition of vanity you quoted is “excessive.” I think many of us publish our work because we are proud of our achievement in creating it. And when someone reads our work and says positive things about it, that validates the achievement. In effect, putting our stuff out there is like saying “Look at what I’ve made.” And when someone says, “Hey, that’s really good,” that validates our positive feelings about our work. There’s nothing excessive about it, so it’s not vanity.
    Without getting into the question of what is vanity, I’ll just say that the term “vanity press” has been picked up to lambaste self-published authors by snobs and those who may secretly envy us for having the gumption to publish our own stuff. (Recognizing, of course, that some self-published writing is bad. But not all, as we know quite well!)

    Liked by 3 people

    1. kingmidget's avatar kingmidget says:

      I agree … what we do doesn’t necessarily meet the definition of “excessive.” I also agree that publishing and enjoying positive reviews and comments is more about validation than vanity.

      Liked by 3 people

  2. I think vanity plays a part, for sure. But I sort of disagree with the connotation that word carries, because I don’t think it’s a bad thing. If I write a book in order to appeal to my own vanity, and people like it and shower me with praise, is there anything wrong with that? It doesn’t diminish the readers’ enjoyment of the story just because I put it out there in the hopes of hearing the cheers of an adoring public. πŸ™‚

    It always feels to me a little odd whenever anyone is criticized for doing something for egotistical reasons. “You only built/created/achieved this to satisfy your own ego!” is not really meaningful, in my opinion. My reaction is, “So what if they did? If it’s good, it’s good.”

    Liked by 3 people

    1. kingmidget's avatar kingmidget says:

      Audrey had a good word for it … validation rather than vanity.

      Liked by 3 people

  3. chucklitka's avatar chucklitka says:

    Putting aside why we write in the first place, for me publishing can be summed up in one word; completion. When I make a painting, it is complete in and of itself. It doesn’t have to be displayed, published, or sold to be a painting. A manuscript, however, remains a manuscript until it is published and made available to readers as a story or a book. If it was written to be read by strangers, it is an unfinished and unrealized project until it is published. I like finishing projects.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. kingmidget's avatar kingmidget says:

      I completely agree. When I started writing, it was to see if I could write a novel. Once I did that, what was the logical next step? For other people to read it. Otherwise, what was the point. And, as far as I’m concerned, a negative review is just as validating as a positive review.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. That’s true. Negative reviews are part of being an author.

        Liked by 3 people

Leave a Comment